Saturday, December 19, 2009

On sleepers

So, Jolly has just outgrown some of his 3-6 month clothing, which brought along with it the obvious exchange for the 6-9 month clothing.

This was the age for which we'd stopped buying tons of sleepers thinking that maybe Jolly would be wearing proper outfits more often instead, and the sleepers only used for sleeping.

Not so.

I get that Jolly is an unusually flaily child, and he is also very interested in his feet, so mileage may vary... but, in these parts, two piece outfits are not very feasible.

First, socks are very fun to take off right now. (Though the new nifty Trumpette socks we got as a gift actually seem to stay on fine.) Secondly, with the amount of kicking he does, pants often ride up and expose calf and knee, and we don't keep the house that warm.

Pants with built in feet seem like they should work well, but then the second problem comes into effect - that our baby is not as wide as the manufacturer intended. So, the pants are either too short (when they fit in the waist) or too wide (when they fit in length).

So, overalls with feet work better. But the shirt underneath also rides up a lot.

Ultimately, sleepers are the best way to ensure that our child remains covered by clothing and we don't have to continually pull down sweaters and pant legs, or pull up pant waists and socks. Two piece outfits are very cute, but the quantity we inherited covers the amount we would need for outings where our child should be extra adorable...particularly outings to other people who heat their houses more. For around our own house, sleepers and long sleeved onesies underneath are the base garment of choice, sometimes with a cardigan sweater over.

I hope other people aren't overly judging of the fact that we're keeping our child in pajamas during the day. But, we periodically see other kids of the same age or older out and about in sleepers, too, so I don't think we're the only ones.

Kudos go to Circo, the Target brand, for having cute, cheap, all-cotton sleepers without slogans or licensed characters. I like their entire range but I'm totally in love with the 3-pack ones that go over the head and don't button down the front, just down the legs. Too bad we didn't discover these until just now (previously they were always on backorder)... we just bought the largest size, but I would love having these in larger sizes to come!

Footie sleepers just seem super comfortable in eliminating the pajama pants riding up. A lot of the reviews for kids' sizes seem to be from college students who manage to squeeze into the extra-large, so (Martha Stewart and) I can't be the only one coveting the infant sleepwear!

4 comments:

  1. Just a thought for you on the sock thing when you have to go out and make him look extra adorable...when my Peanut started pulling off her socks I decided it was time for some "shoes." I use the Robeez brand and they are soft and comfortable and "make" the outfit but best of all they always keep the socks in place. I agree if you're just hanging out at home the sleepers are the best way to go but thought I would give you a heads up on the "shoes."

    Also we are strictly in one-piece land over here because we are crawling and she gets caught on her shirts if I try and put her in a two piece outfit. Just an FYI, Carters has great fleece one piece jumpsuits (some with feet, some without) for a great price (I think around $7 a piece) right now and we are LIVING in them. They are much warmer than the standard sleepers and are most suitable for going out and not looking like they are leaving the house in jammies. Tip, if you don't know this already, buy big. Carters runs really small. Peanut turns 8 months tomorrow and she's in 12 months (12 months for them equals 9-12 months, 6 months equals 3-6 months and 9 months equals 6-9 months). Hope this helps, not that you need help...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh my gosh, this is super helpful! We were actually given some Robeez as a gift in the 6-12 month size and I bet it would fit now! Duh!

    And thanks also for the heads up on the Carter's fleece jumpsuits. We got one of those as a hand-me-down and were sad when it was outgrown, and we should totally look into buying some of those! Carter's seems to actually fit fairly true to size here because Jolly is so skinny and the extra slack appears to allow extra length in stretchy items... and the onesies actually seem to be running large, go figure!

    The baby sizing schemes are so weird. We lined everything up by length to try to get things sorted right in comparison, and the same actual size was all over the place in terms of the label size in different brands!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ella is in 12-18month clothes now (although I had to admit we've had to put a few 12-18m tshirts away because they are too small), and our problem is these clothes are generally designed for kids that are walking. Footed onesies are very few and far between, especially limited as we are to secondhandclothesavailableinDunedinNewZealand. There are lots of pants, overalls, jeans & t-shirts etc, and way less in the way of onsies and clothes that are more useful for a six month old who sits on her butt a lot and doesn't even roll both ways yet. A lot of the clothes simply ride up and she ends up with a tshirt at underarm level. And then there's the big cloth nappy butt that takes her to a two year old size which of course are waaay to long. Pants often look ridiculous - far to tight in the butt and waay too long. Can't win!
    Hope those faux jeans work okay for the wee mannie!

    ReplyDelete